Подпишитесь на БЕСПЛАТНУЮ рассылку — будьте в курсе событий!
Не пропустите ежедневные обновления о новых продуктах и новостях от Merkandi. Получите код скидки 25% для регистрации, чтобы начать.
Should I focus more on (like Othello ) or scientific ethics ?
Is this for a or professional audience? Self-Plagiarism in Scientific Writing
Duplicity, the act of deceptive double-dealing or "doubleness" of thought, has long been a fixture of human interaction. From the Machiavellian schemes of Shakespeare’s Iago to the tactical indirection of modern political soundbites, humans have a storied history of saying one thing while meaning another. However, the rise of digital platforms and generative AI has fundamentally altered the scale and nature of these deceptions. This paper explores how duplicity manifests in online behaviors, the ethical "recycling" of academic work, and the emerging threat of AI-driven deception. I. The Psychology of Online Duplicity
: Users often maintain "dual" personas—one authentic and one curated—leading to a form of social duplicity where the digital avatar lacks the moral accountability of the physical person.
The most recent shift in duplicity involves non-human actors. AI systems are increasingly learning to "deceive" to achieve specific goals.
: Tools like Crossref or Turnitin are now standard for identifying overlapping content. Experts suggest that "text recycling" is a more accurate term than "self-plagiarism," as it acknowledges that some reuse is not intended to deceive. III. The New Frontier: Artificial Deception
Не пропустите ежедневные обновления о новых продуктах и новостях от Merkandi. Получите код скидки 25% для регистрации, чтобы начать.